The Ohio State University

onCampus

• Help
• Buckeye Link
• Map
• Find People
• Webmail
• Search

  Search Ohio State Go

Exhibit at OSU Urban Arts Space tackles notions of landmark and landscape

November 18, 2009

By Julia Harris

Ask your average Columbus citizen what the city’s landmark sites and structures are and you’re likely to get a furrowed look in return.

And then the usual suspects will pop up: LeVeque Tower, the Statehouse, maybe the full-scale replica of the Santa Maria, definitely the iconic Ohio Stadium.

What you’re not likely to hear mentioned are places like “The Gates of Hell,” a rugged urban hollow beneath High Street full of graffiti and mythology, or the “Salt Mountain,” a shifting elevation of road salt stored north of I-670. Continue reading ‘Exhibit at OSU Urban Arts Space tackles notions of landmark and landscape’

Transparent conversion

November 18, 2009

The semester committee, leadership in place, has launched a newsletter and Web site to keep the community informed

By Julia Harris

Steve Fink has no illusions about the scope of the task before him.

“As soon as my name went out there, a lot of people I know expressed their condolences,” he said with a laugh. “But the way I see it, the conversion process is going to be happening whether I’m part of it or not, and I prefer to take an active role.”

The process he’s referring to, of course, is Ohio State’s conversion from quarters to semesters, according to a calendar adopted last June by the University Senate. Continue reading ‘Transparent conversion’

Everything you need to know about international travel

November 18, 2009

University’s export controls policy helps safeguard faculty — and faculty research — while working overseas

By Jeff McCallister

Terry Conlisk had been invited to present a paper at a prestigious conference, and for efficiency’s sake, he figured it best to take his presentation on his laptop computer.

But as he planned his trip, it occurred to him that as a professor of mechanical engineering, his computer likely contained information — from login encryption software to certain other programs even to some of his own research — that the United States government may not exactly appreciate him taking with him; the conference, the International Workshop on Continuum Modeling of Biomolecules, was in Beijing, China.

So part of his planning for the trip included a call to the Office of Research Compliance, which is charged with overseeing the university’s export controls policy.

Export controls regulate both items (such as laptops, GPS units, cell phones) and some types of research information (such as restricted or proprietary data). Whether the item or information is regulated is based on the specific item as well as where the item is going.

Non-compliance with export controls can result in heavy fines and criminal charges against the individual involved and sanctions against the university. It can result in the loss of research contracts, governmental funding and the ability to export items.

“To be honest, I think faculty are about 90 to 95 percent completely ignorant of the entire policy,” Conlisk said. “It’s just something that in general they do not think about.”

While the vast majority of research done at Ohio State is shielded from export controls under the fundamental research exclusion — basic and applied research, the results of which ordinarily are published and shared broadly within the scientific community — there are numerous examples of instances that could trigger export controls, according to Jennifer Yucel, Ohio State’s export controls administrator.

Some examples are: Research in export restricted science and engineering areas such as military articles, nuclear technology, select biological agents or toxins and satellite technology; traveling overseas with high-tech equipment, confidential, unpublished or proprietary information or data, sponsored research containing contractual restrictions on publication or dissemination. Even the sharing of certain information with a foreign national (and even if that person is, say, one of a professor’s own graduate students) is covered by export controls.

“It’s a very complicated set of regulations, administered by three different departments of the US government,” Yucel said. “We don’t expect anyone to know everything about what’s covered, so we would strongly urge anyone traveling across the border to get in touch with this office to make sure everything’s in order first. Our primary goal is to make sure that people have the correct information if they are asked for it when traveling.”

Conlisk, for example, decided to take his laptop, but first backed it up on an exterior hard drive and purged the computer of any files that could have been export controlled. He then had Yucel’s office take a look and issue any necessary paperwork for anything he had left.

“They tell you you could very well get your laptop confiscated at the border, either when you enter another country or when you’re coming back to the US,” Conlisk said. “If you don’t have the right licenses and such, it really could ruin your day.”

In the end, Conlisk said that thanks to the advance preparation, his trip to Beijing went off without a hitch. “It was rather pleasant,” he said. “I was surprised how easy it actually was.”

A copy of the Ohio State policy on export controls as well as general information and FAQs on export controls can be found at orc.osu.edu/exportcontrol/index.cfm.

Ohio State ranked in the top 20 nationally for international students and study abroad

November 18, 2009

Ohio State ranks as one of the nation’s top 20 universities for its international student enrollment and the number of students studying abroad, according to a national report.

Ohio State is ranked 14th among the nation’s colleges and universities for hosting 4,583 international students and 20th with 1,704 students studying abroad. Ohio State also ranks sixth in the nation with 1,449 students studying abroad on short-term programs. Short-term programs are defined as taking place during the summer, January term or for eight weeks or less during the academic year.

These findings were issued as part of the Open Doors 2009 report, an annual survey published by the Institute of International Education.

“As the importance of international and cultural exchange becomes an increasingly critical component of a student’s education, Ohio State is developing a plan that will give us a presence in key locations around the world,” said William Brustein, Ohio State’s new vice provost for global strategies and international affairs. “Our national rankings provide us with a good foundation from which we can build.”

Brustein recently joined Ohio State and is responsible for integrating international and multicultural experiences to the academic units within the university and expanding and enhancing its global reach.

He is developing plans for Ohio State to open “Global Gateways” that will serve as a central location in another country or region of the world where the university will be able to engage alumni, recruit international students, foster partnerships for faculty with universities abroad and enhance study abroad opportunities for students. Ohio State would start with Global Gateways in China, India and Brazil.

Also part of Ohio State’s strategy is to provide international learning experiences that will be based on global competency skills. “In today’s world students need to be globally aware and familiar with global change,” Brustein said. “They must be able to adapt to diverse cultures and be able to communicate across cultural boundaries. And students must be able to comprehend the international dimension of their field of study.

“We are preparing a strategy that will ensure our students will succeed in this new and changing global marketplace.”

International students at Ohio State are from 119 different countries including China (1,161); India (876); South Korea (820); Taiwan (272) and Indonesia (122). Nationally, the leading home countries for international students are India, China, South Korea, Japan and Canada.

The most popular destinations for Ohio State students to study abroad include United Kingdom, Italy, China, France, Germany and Spain. Nationally, the leading destinations for studying abroad are the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, France and China.

The Open Doors 2009 report is released as part of the nationwide observance of International Education Week (Nov. 16-20), a joint initiative established by the US departments of Education and State.

At Ohio State, the week is celebrated with a number of activities sponsored by the Office of International Affairs, which oversees Ohio State’s study abroad programs and international student and scholar services.

The office also advances high quality international education programs, scholarships and service activities to promote global opportunities for Ohio State, its faculty, staff and students.

Brustein began early on path to internationalization

Shortly after John F. Kennedy was elected president of the United States, the nation as a whole began to reach out across its borders to help developing areas around the world. It was in that setting that a young Connecticut high school student named William Brustein first started developing international relationships in education.

He participated in the formation and led a student group that began helping schools in third-world nations get needed supplies and other aid.

The group gained impressive notoriety — when basketball player Meadowlark Lemon heard of what had become a widespread effort started by a high school student, he brought his team, the Harlem Globetrotters, to play a benefit game to raise money.

Former Connecticut Sen. Abraham Ribicoff lauded the group’s efforts (which by then was helping schools in Nigeria, India and Peru) in a speech to the US Senate, calling out Brustein and the group as examples others around the nation could follow.

“From very early on, I’ve always been fascinated with other cultures,” Brustein said. “My father was a journalist, and from a young age, I had access to newspapers from around the world and I read them all the time.”

By the time he arrived as an undergrad at the University of Connecticut, he already was well advanced on the career path that has brought him to Ohio State as vice provost for global strategies and international affairs.

He participated in exchange programs as a student and professor in Italy, Germany, France and England and talked his way into a junior-year abroad program in France, even though at the time his French wasn’t quite good enough to qualify. He brought it up to speed in time and found himself participating in the French student uprising of 1968.

He’s since gone on to become one of the most respected and accomplished leaders in internationalizing higher education in the US, directing international programs at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign before arriving at Ohio State.

He’s already made a mark here, helping to shape the report and recommendations of the President’s and Provost’s Council on Strategic Internationalization that has developed the university’s international goals.

Ohio State has afforded me the wonderful opportunity to focus on developing the initiatives,” he said. “Because we have Dieter Wanner to oversee the day-to-day operations of the Office of International Affairs, my charge is to spend my time developing these global strategies, how to make the best use of Ohio State’s depth, breadth and reach to fulfill the land-grant mission. It’s been a fascinating experience already and I’m excited about the things to come.”

Don’t be happy, be worried

November 18, 2009

Sports fans need dose of the negative to enjoy the game

By Jeff Grabmeier, Research Communications

For sports fans watching their favorite team play, the greatest enjoyment comes with a strong dollop of fear and maybe even near-despair, a new study suggests.

Researchers studied fans of two college football teams as they watched the teams’ annual rivalry game on television.

They found that fans of the winning team who, at some point during the game, were almost certain their team would lose, ended up thinking the game was the most thrilling and suspenseful.

“You don’t want to be in a great mood during the whole game if you really want to enjoy it,” said Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, associate professor of communication and co-author of the study.

“We found that negative emotions play a key role in how much we enjoy sports.”

The study will appear in the December issue of the Journal of Communication.

Researchers studied 113 college students as they watched the 2006 OSU-Michigan football game.  While the game has always been a bitter rivalry, the stakes were particularly high that year: Ohio State was ranked No. 1 in the country and Michigan was second. The winner was assured of a berth in the BCS National Championship game.

Ohio State won the game 42-39 in a dramatic finish.

“Ohio State was winning easily in the first half, but the good thing for our study was that Michigan really tightened the game in the second half. It turned out to be a great game,” said Prabu David, associate professor of communication and study co-author.

Students from Ohio State, Michigan and Michigan State participated in the study. Before the game, they completed questionnaires about which team they were rooting for and how committed they were to their favorite team.

They then watched the game on television from wherever they wanted and logged on to a Web site during the 24 commercial breaks to answer questions about the likelihood that their favorite team would win, how suspenseful they thought the game was and how positively or negatively they were feeling at the moment.

The results showed how important negative emotions were to enjoyment of the game.

“When people think about entertainment in general, they think it has to be fun and pleasurable. But enjoyment doesn’t always mean positive emotions,” David said.

“Sometimes enjoyment is derived by having the negative emotion and then juxtaposing that with the positive emotion.”

Results showed that positive feelings during the game had the greatest effect on suspense, but negative feelings also played a role.

In the past, researchers have thought of positive and negative emotions experienced in entertainment as cancelling each other out, David said. But this research suggests that both positive and negative emotions act independently and together to contribute to entertainment and enjoyment.

“You need the negative emotions of thinking your team might lose to get you in an excited, nervous state,” Knobloch-Westerwick said. “If your team wins, all that negative tension is suddenly converted to positive energy, which will put you in a euphoric state.”

That’s why the fans of the winning team who felt the most sense of enjoyable suspense were also those who at some point were most convinced their team would lose, she said.

David said the results of this study closely followed those of a previous study he did with colleagues that examined fan reaction during the 2006 Super Bowl between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Seattle Seahawks.

The results of that study also showed the importance of negative feelings in contributing to how much fans enjoyed the game.

“Obviously, winning helps people enjoy a game. But we’re finding that it doesn’t help to have a game where you have positive feelings the whole game — negative feelings are an important part of enjoying a game,” he said.

While some people may question the purpose of studying fan reactions to a football game, the researchers say the study has important implications.

For one, sports provide a unique opportunity to study how emotions operate in people.

“Researchers want to study the impact of emotions, but it is very difficult to create powerful emotional reactions in a laboratory setting,” David said.

“This is a study that was done in the real world, and we can get a snapshot into a person’s emotional state while they are actually experiencing the emotion. Sports creates emotions that are very powerful, and which matter to people.”

Employees volunteer for hands-on role in moving university forward

November 18, 2009

By Adam King

Richelle Simonson found herself far outside her comfort zone, standing inside a circle of chairs at the Longaberger Alumni House in front of a sizeable group of fellow OSU employees, most of whom she had never met.

She had the group’s rapt attention, though, as she talked about changing the way they approached their jobs and how to better collaborate with one another through understanding personality types and removing real or perceived obstacles.

Simonson had just finished her own training on these and other concepts, and this was her first foray as a newly minted facilitator — an OSU employee who volunteers to help President Gordon Gee change the workplace culture one unit or department at a time. Simonson is one of 22 facilitators who have been recruited and trained to host sessions across campus to help build a high-performance workforce, an integral part of Gee’s six imperatives needed to bring the university from excellence to eminence.

“There’s a unique opportunity for us right now to get even better,” said Simonson, senior director for strategic services at Facilities, Operations and Development, who has been at OSU for 18 years. “It’s about attaining whatever our maximum potential is. It’s a huge undertaking. It has long-ranging ramifications, it won’t be easy and it will take a lot of work and commitment. But the institution is ready, and I think Ohio State is an outstanding place to work and I believe in it.”

Her belief in OSU is so strong she was willing to put aside her own fears of whether she could successfully present the concepts, many of which Simonson had fundamentally ingrained in her work ethic. But never before had she seen the concepts packaged in a way many could so easily understand.

Yet going through the training, Simonson found her own bedrock foundation was able to shift in new ways.

“For me I’ve changed in that I’m still being assertive and willing to push agendas forward, but I try to do it in a way that embraces everyone, no matter what their style is,” Simonson said. “I’ve had to be much more conscientious in that this is how I’m a controlling style and this is how I approach this. Those competing personality styles, they approach it from a completely different perspective.

“Because of the culture-shaping process, I’m actually very quickly able to identify where they’re at in their style or their approach and adjust mine accordingly so that we can be more effective. I also do a lot of coaching and feedback now with people I might not have approached in the past.”

It’s that personal buy-in to the culture shaping that is critical for facilitators to be effective, said Todd Suddeth, program director for the Todd Anthony Bell National Resource Center on the African American Male, who began facilitating in October.

Working at the university since 2002 has been an “incredible journey,” he said, because it’s made him a better person and raised his quality of life. He felt driven to give something back and believed helping shape the OSU culture would deliver the biggest return on his time investment.

“Work performance is something I’ve always been interested in,” Suddeth said. “One of the main things I want people to take away from these retreats is just be curious as to the direction President Gee wants to take the university, curious about what culture plays in any organization and how culture shows up in what we do at the university and curious about thinking differently: What can I do? What can I do better? Can the sessions be effective in making me an effective employee and make my teams more effective? Will I have better relationships with my coworkers? A lot of that starts with being curious and actually trying something different.”

Those who agree to become facilitators take a big leap toward trying something different. They have to take two weeks off from their jobs to go through intensive training and then lead two-day “unfreezing retreats” as well as follow-up half-day sessions that reinforce the concepts they teach. The facilitators also meet with each other once a month to go over their successes and struggles.

And the president himself seems pleased with their results.

“When I first met with the facilitators last spring, I told them that they were like drum majors — setting the direction and leading the charge,” said Gee. “They are doing a superb job as champions for positive and lasting change at the university, helping to create a campus culture that isvibrant, innovative and fully supportive of shared successes.”

Peer-to-peer interaction

A key element to making OSU’s culture change a success is having university employees teach the sessions. The facilitators live and breathe the current culture and understand university jargon.

“The trust level is higher if you see fellow employees who have bought into the process and taken time out of their regular work schedules to do this,” said Todd Suddeth, who started facilitating in October. “Those going through the sessions might say, ‘If this person is taking time out of their schedule, there must be something to this and this person must believe in this process. Since they have experience working here and they see this is something that can work better in their department, maybe I should take this seriously to improve what’s going on in my area.’”

New facilitators are likely to be recruited in 2010, and Richelle Simonson, who became a facilitator this year, said it’s important those new trainers come from all employment levels.

“Having a good mix of facilitators is going to strengthen this program,” she said. “It was a huge growth experience for me. But I also learned that there are a tremendous number of talented people on this campus who are fundamentally committed to making us better. They come from all walks of life and backgrounds, but at the end of the day, there’s a love for this campus and people want to do what’s right so individuals and teams can grow and the institution can achieve whatever its destiny is.”

Ohio State leads effort on behalf of alumnus Jesse Owens

November 18, 2009

Legislative committee holds hearing to consider which Ohioan to include in US Capitol Statuary Hall

Ohio State is leading an initiative to have a statue of legendary track star Jesse Owens represent the state of Ohio in the US Capitol’s National Statuary Hall.

The university presented its case to members of the National Statuary Collection Study Committee Nov. 6 in the Campus Reading Room at Thompson Library.

“Jesse Owens was not only a stellar athlete, but a true diplomat for humanity,” said Rusty Wilson, an Ohio State alumnus, staff member and author of the book, The Ohio State University at the Olympics. “His athletic accomplishments have long been surpassed, and although he has been gone for more than 29 years, he still is recognized the world over more for his triumph over adversity and tyranny.

“In fact, whenever I travel abroad and mention The Ohio State University, people respond ‘Ah, Jesse Owens’ university.’ It’s clear he is considered the ultimate Olympian and example of all that is positive in sport,” said Wilson.

Wilson was one of several university and community representatives who spoke to the committee on the appropriateness of Owens’ selection. Speakers also included Ohio State alumnae Marlene Owens Rankin, who is Owens’ daughter, and Stephanie Hightower, a former student athlete and Olympic track star, as well as alumnus and former student-athlete Rob Oller, a Columbus Dispatch columnist.

Rankin is vice president and managing director of The Jesse Owens Foundation.

The National Statuary Hall houses 100 marble statues — two from each state — of individuals of notable historic importance who reflect and represent the values of their native state. Ohio has been represented by President James A. Garfield, chosen in 1886, and William Allen, chosen in 1887. In 2000, Ohio’s General Assembly decided to replace the statue of Allen, a former governor who opposed Lincoln’s emancipation of the slaves. The study committee has been charged with finding a suitable replacement.

Owens, who grew up in Cleveland, broke several world records while competing for Ohio State in 1935. He made history at the 1936 Berlin Olympics by winning four gold medals in track and field, thwarting Adolf Hitler’s intention of proving Aryan superiority at the Games.

Forty years after he won his gold medals, Owens received the Medal of Freedom from President Gerald Ford. In 1979, President Jimmy Carter honored Owens with a Living Legend Award, and, in 1990, President George H. W. Bush awarded him a posthumous Congressional Gold Medal.

Owens died in 1980.

Hidden Benefits Fair makes a move to 4-H building

November 18, 2009

By Adam King

In its 15th year, the Hidden Benefits Fair on Dec. 2 will be appearing in a new location that aims to make it easier for the thousands of faculty and staff who plan to attend.

Up until last year, the Hidden Benefits Fair, which welcomes university and outside vendors, was held at the French Field House. The University Staff Advisory Committee, which sponsors the fair, wanted to make it even more centrally located, especially for those employees who didn’t have easy walking or bus route access.

Moving it to the Nationwide and Ohio Farm Bureau 4-H Building puts the event right on a CABS route, and the Jerome Schottenstein Center parking lot, which is directly across the street, will be available. No parking permits will be needed in the lot during the 11 a.m.-2 p.m. fair.

CABS busing will be available via Campus Loop North and North Express that both stop at the agriculture campus, a block and a half walk to the 4-H center. The Med Center Express, which runs every 15 minutes, will be adding a special stop from 10 a.m.-3 p.m. in front of the 4-H building on Dec. 2 only.

But there was another reason the move made sense to USAC.

“Our committee members are big fans of the sustainability impact of the beautiful facility,” said Hallie Fargnolli, co-chair of USAC’s Outreach Committee and one of the main organizers of the event. The 4-H building is currently the only certified “green” building on campus.

The Hidden Benefits Fair was created to show faculty and staff the many benefits available to them as Ohio State employees. OSU units and organizations are able to highlight goods and services that sometimes fly under the radar at such a large university, and outside vendors often provide substantial OSU-only discounts or specials, and the fair is one way they let employees know about their offers.

“For these reasons it is important for faculty and staff to attend, and supervisors are encouraged to promote employee participation,” Fargnolli said. “While the fair is aimed at tapping in to discount programs and services, there also will be a focus on wellness and health coaching opportunities.”

The new location will provide a separate room for extra privacy for those who are planning to take a biometric screening through Your Plan for Health, the vendor layout will have some purpose and a new area for food samples will be in place. And the fair will no longer be a hindrance for OSU athletes who need to use the field house for training.

For more information about the Hidden Benefits Fair and the vendors that will be attending, visit usac.osu.edu.

The case for change

November 4, 2009

Today’s issue of onCampus takes a close look at the university’s transformation from Excellence to Eminence.

Because “We have limitless capacity to do good in the world,” President Gordon Gee makes a personal case for making the change: From Excellence to Eminence

Nearly everyone on campus knows about President Gee’s six Strategic Imperatives for moving from Excellence to Eminence. onCampus explores how to succeed in each of them: How We’ll Get There

Successful corporate transformation is much more than making superficial changes, and the same goes in higher education. One Fisher College of Business expert highlights some common factors in true transformation: Real Transformation Takes Dedication, Hard Work

New chemistry, engineering facility moves forward

November 4, 2009

By Adam King

In the early stages of President Gordon Gee’s One University Framework campus master planning review, the William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering was slated to move from Koffolt Lab into a rebuilt Lord Hall on 17th Avenue.

But the review found that location to be too far away to keep an envisioned science and engineering corridor intact.

Meanwhile, the Department of Chemistry’s synthetics group, which was to be paired with chemcial and biomolecular engineering, was in need of new space as well with Evans Lab falling more into disrepair.

The situation became the perfect opportunity to demonstrate one of the core concepts of the One Framework. Since many of the needs of the two departments are similar, they’ll now be paired into a new building along 19th Avenue.

“The overall university plan is not to increase the square footage in terms of footprint but the quality and impact of square footage we devote to teaching and research,” said Malcolm Chisholm, chair of the Department of Chemistry. “To bring these departments into proximity is about fostering interactions. When it comes to getting research dollars, federal or otherwise, one needs to hunt in packs and you may need an engineer, physicist, chemist or biologist as part of a team to solve some of these important problems that Ohio State is focusing on.”

The Board of Trustees gave the go-ahead in October to enter the design stage for the 200,000-square-foot structure, which also will help Ohio State avoid tens of millions of dollars in deferred maintenance since four old buildings are coming down in order to build the new one: Aviation Building, Johnston Lab and Boyd and Haskett halls.

Coming down

A quartet of buildings that are considered past their prime will be removed beginning in 2012 to make way for a new structure that will house part of the Department of Chemistry and the entire William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. Clockwise from left are the Aviation Building (the adjoined Johnston Lab is slated for demolition as well), Boyd Hall and Haskett Hall. The Board of Trustees gave its approval for the new building, part of which will be called Koffolt Lab, to enter the design phase. Construction will be completed in 2014.

At the same time, combining the departments in one location builds on Gee’s One University philosophy of collaboration, said Stuart Cooper, chair of chemical and biomolecular engineering. He noted many of his faculty have joint appointments, and it just makes sense to have like-minded departments working together.

“There are commonalities in terms of energy, nanotechnology and biotechnology that nicely overlap both disciplines,” Cooper said.

“There also are things unique to chemical engineering that the new building will accommodate. It’s a nice realization to me of the vision that President Gee has for how the campus should look in the future. These joint engineering-science buildings are going up around the country, sometimes with chemistry, sometimes with biological sciences. But this is our fit and I think it will work out nicely.

“In addition, this new building will support the “Students First” theme of our campus since it will provide CBE the means to continue offering a first-rate undergraduate education program by investing in interactive classrooms and laboratories.”

The $126 million building, of which $96.5 million will come from state capital use funds, will begin construction in 2012 with a 2014 move-in date. Chemistry, which has raised $2 million of its required $12 million in private donations, will occupy 43,600 square feet of the 109,000 square feet of usable space with chemical and biomolecular engineering (CBE) taking the rest. Thanks to William Lowrie’s $17 million gift to engineering, the first that went toward naming a department at Ohio State, CBE has raised $13 million of its $17.5 million portion.

Lowrie’s gift also ensures keeping the Koffolt name with the CBE department, so CBE’s portion of the building will retain the Koffolt Lab name. Chemistry’s portion of the building is open for naming rights.

Jointly the departments have applied for $15 million in federal stimulus dollars to the National Institutes of Standards and Technology as well as the National Institutes of Health. They should know within four months if that money is approved.

Though the building is five years from becoming reality, it’s already having a positive effect on both departments.

Cooper said CBE would be able to continue competing for high-quality faculty, who might have considered other universities that had already invested in more modern facilities.

“Three to four years down the road is not a great time to wait for faculty who plan to spend a career here,” Cooper said, “so we’re already showing rough sketches to faculty prospects. This also will transform us in terms of good, quality space for our participation in some of the important themes in OSU research in energy, biotech and nanotech.”

One Framework is a comprehensive master plan that establishes a long-range (20-50 years) physical vision for the Ohio State campus. It will be a structure for guiding change over time that connects ideas, information, and implementation.

The plan is unique in that it involves the entire campus and the surrounding community rather than individual parts such as athletics or the Medical Center or Student Life. It is expected to be complete and ready for approval by the board by late winter or early spring 2010.

keep looking »