Honors faculty consider establishing permanent council
By Emily Caldwell
Ohio State faculty who teach Honors courses are strongly considering
joining forces to form a Universitywide and constitutionally established
council to oversee Honors offerings at the University.
Such a body could provide maintenance and oversee delivery of courses
and research experiences to undergraduate Honors students, said Dan Farrell,
interim associate provost for Honors and Scholars curriculum and chair
of the Department of Philosophy. He cited three general areas likely to
concern a new council: organizational issues, course offerings and funding.
Under the current structure,"Honors decisions are made in the colleges
-- department chairs ask faculty to teach an Honors course, and it's done,"
Farrell said during a March meeting of Honors faculty -- the first such
gathering of its kind."I'm staggered by our success considering how informally
this is done."
And the program is successful, he noted. In the Colleges of the Arts
and Sciences alone, the number of students enrolled in Honors courses
has nearly doubled in a dozen years. He said that in 1985-86, the colleges
offered 90 courses in 130 sections to almost 2,400 students. Last academic
year, that had grown to 162 courses in 247 sections serving 4,668 students.
Also among the issues such a council could address is the size of the
overall Honors program, which some suggest may be larger than it ideally
should be. Of the 5,800 freshmen enrolled in autumn 1999, 1,300 qualified
for Honors status based generally on an ACT score of 29 or higher and
ranking in the top 10 percent of their high school classes.
"That seems a bit large for a special program," Farrell said. He suggested
the establishment of a series of solid Scholars programs -- including
the Mount Leadership Society piloted this year and three in development
to begin next year -- could allow the University to"raise the bar" of
the Honors program, perhaps by increasing the minimum ACT score required
for admission.
Because of the diversity of programs offering Honors courses, any centralized
program likely would focus on admissions policies, graduation requirements,
maintaining sufficient funding for the program and consideration of requirements
necessary to sustain Honors status rather than detailing curriculum requirements,
John Bruno, professor of psychology and chair of the Ad Hoc Honors Faculty
Advisory Council, suggested.
Some faculty have expressed preference for maintaining departmental
control over establishment of Honors programs to allow for freedom in
developing experimental courses."The flexibility has been such an asset
in attracting faculty to teach Honors courses," said David Hahm, acting
chair of Greek and Latin.
Farrell and the ad hoc advisory council have reconvened since the March
meeting of Honors faculty and are continuing to examine the possibilities
of forming a permanent council.
The initiative has the support of Martha Garland, vice provost and dean
for undergraduate studies. Garland said that not having an established
council has been a weakness at the University, but noted that Honors faculty
"ought to all be grateful to one another because Honors, as it has grown,
has done so because of the voluntary teaching and departmental efforts."
"We need to have a body of folks whose job is governed by the faculty
rules," Garland said."It could still be locally based. But an enterprise
across campus is quite critical."
She also suggested a similar structure could be put in place as the
University expands its Scholars programs."We've seen over time the value
the Honors enterprise has had to the University. We'd like to see it extended
to a larger group of students."
That concept led to a series of changes about a year ago, when the Honors
Center was renamed the University Honors & Scholars Center as part of
an administrative expansion designed to embrace the Scholars programs
in development. The center is working with other campus departments to
recruit and serve non-honors students who are high academic achievers
and who come to Ohio State because of a special talent or program offered
by the University. Many will be University scholarship recipients and
may be students who wish to live in special living-learning programs.
Next year, Scholars programs in the arts, pre-health sciences and the
humanities will be launched.
"We need faculty oversight of Honors, and we also need faculty oversight
of Scholars programs," Garland said. Farrell has been organizing an advisory
faculty group supporting Scholars initiatives.
The era of budget restructuring at the University also concerns some
faculty involved in Honors programs.
The proposed budget restructuring process will encourage colleges and
departments to provide new programs, create new courses, reduce closed-course
problems, collaborate with industry partners, expand federally funded
research and undertake other initiatives. Under the process, revenue generated
by such activities as offering more classes to students closed out of
courses and creating new majors that meet student career plans will be
used to provide direct financial support for the programs that create
them.
Some Honors faculty have expressed concern that such an incentive-based
structure could threaten the maintenance and growth of specialized Honors
programs that wouldn't necessarily generate revenues.
Executive Vice President and Provost Edward J. Ray has said that while
the allocation of resources under the new budget process would clearly
identify and support the University's most treasured academic areas, it
will retain flexibility, as well.
The most recently released budget restructuring document acknowledges
that support of resource-intensive Honors programs has been a concern
throughout the development of budget restructuring.
An Honors Subcommittee chaired by Farrell has recommended that base
budgets for colleges engaged in undergraduate teaching be determined,
in part, by their Honors activities in consultation with the associate
provost for Honors and Scholars curriculum, and also recommended a three-fold
increase in the associate provost's funding for Honors course development.
Farrell is expected to serve as interim associate provost until July;
a search is in progress for the permanent post.
"We agree that incentives based solely on course classification are
not advisable and that base budgets should reflect Honors support," the
budget restructuring document states."We also recommend that the associate
provost for Honors and Scholars curriculum should have sufficient funding
to reward and complement college and department program efforts. The effectiveness
of these mechanisms will need to be monitored to assess their adequacy."
In response to this story, Ray also said that"the ultimate goal of
budget restructuring is to align resources with the goals we set for the
University consistent with our shared values. Honors and the new Scholars
initiative are activities that are important to us and will be strongly
supported under the revised budget process."

This diagram illustrates the scope of the Oval/Mirror Lake/River of
Trees restoration project. The River of Trees pedestrian walkway will
connect with the Olentangy River.
Oval, Mirror Lake Hollow restoration project to be linked to River of
Trees
By Randy Gammage
The rebuilding of the Mirror Lake walls originally scheduled for this
summer has been delayed until the summer of 2001 in anticipation of a
design project for the restoration of the Oval and Mirror Lake Hollow.
The nationally-known landscape architecture firm of Michael Van Valkenburgh
Associates has been hired for these projects, and has been commissioned
to design a pedestrian walkway, called the River of Trees, that will connect
the Oval and Mirror Lake with the Olentangy River.
The overall project, aimed at reclaiming the historic qualities of the
Oval and Mirror Lake Hollow, is in the schematic design phase. If funding
becomes available, construction of certain pieces of the project would
be scheduled to begin next summer.
"This isn't something that's going to happen tomorrow. It's probably
a three- to five-year project," said John Lawter, University landscape
architect.
Once a wetland fed by Neil Run and a nearby spring, in 1895 Mirror Lake
was dredged and expanded to three times its original size. Islands were
constructed and connected by footbridges, while the grassy banks were
fortified with rocks. But over time, the lake's elegant shape was simplified,
the islands were removed, and the masonry walls built to stabilize the
banks began to erode.
The rejuvenated lake will blend past beauty with current technology.
"We're looking at a redesign of the Mirror Lake area, and as part of
that, we're exploring the idea of adding a bioengineering design component
to help improve the water quality," Lawter said.
Bioengineering components might incorporate plants into the edge of
Mirror Lake to help filter water naturally. Another idea being considered,
Lawter said, is a system to pump water through filters that collect debris
and could be changed periodically like those in a home furnace.
The Oval restoration also will combine history with contemporary needs,
with designers taking into consideration the hallowed nature of the treasured
space.
"They're talking about significant change, but in subtle ways, so that
when you step out onto the Oval you'll feel a positive change, but you
won't be able to put a finger on it," Lawter said.
Once drawn up, the plan will call for irrigating the grass, reducing
paving, and removing some of the foliage that obstructs views of buildings
facing the Oval, he said. said. Landscaping will contrast mature trees
already present with new flowering trees and evergreens.
"The most controversial piece being proposed removes the parking lots
in front of Orton Hall and the Faculty Club," Lawter said,"but alternate
solutions to the parking issues are being proposed."
One possible solution entails creating a new parking lot next to the
Main Library and transforming Hagerty Drive from a service drive to more
of a street with added parking in back of Hagerty Hall.
Lawter said improving the infrastructure of the Oval with irrigation,
drainage, and the proper soil and seed mix is crucial to its future.
"The Oval is our most sacred space," Lawter said."It gets the same
use as an athletic field but it doesn't get the same level of attention
in terms of turf management and irrigation. The Oval deserves the same
level of durability and care that we give our athletic fields."
The Oval renovation also will include new site furniture, walks and
building faŤade lighting that illuminates the face of prominent buildings,
said Laura Shinn, campus planner in the Office of the University Architect
and Physical Planning.
"One of the things that is really powerful is the fact that the buildings
create an edge for the space," Shinn said.
The University also has plans to link its beauty to that of the Olentangy
River. The River of Trees will connect Mirror Lake Hollow and the river,
and will feature a pedestrian walkway running along the south side of
the Larkins fields, with groves of trees and inviting places to sit and
congregate within an enhanced landscape. It will capitalize on a bike
trail being built by the city of Columbus that is almost complete, which
runs along the river from downtown to Interstate 270, Shinn said.
"One of the challenges is, 'How do we get people across Cannon Drive
and down to the river?'" she said.
Lawter said construction work on the projects would take place in phases,
much like the renovation work at Ohio Stadium, which will allow the University
to maintain accessibility to the Oval and Mirror Lake.
While $500,000 in University funds was already in place for the replacement
of the walls at Mirror Lake, additional money will need to be raised as
the Oval/Mirror Lake Hollow/River of Trees project progresses. John Meyer,
assistant vice president in the Office of Development, said a combination
of University money and private funds will pay for the project.
"The Office of Development is planning on being involved in making the
project happen," Meyer said."Part of the fund-raising will be to establish
an endowment for maintenance on the Oval."
|