OnCampus Discoveries

April 11, 2002
Vol. 31, No.18


Contents graphicNews/FeaturesDiscoveriesForumIn InkRecognitionsMemosCalendarOSU Faculty/StaffNews & InformationOSU HomeOn Campus Home

A gecko sits atop Thomas Hetherington's shoulder.

 

By Jo McCulty

OSU study: Lizards and salamanders may use lungs to hear

By Holly Wagner, Research Communications

Certain species of salamanders and lizards can actually hear through their lungs, according to a new study at Ohio State.

The research extends previous studies showing that some types of earless frogs and toads use their lungs to pick up sound vibrations, said Thomas Hetherington, an associate professor of evolution, ecology and organismal biology.

The results of the current study suggest lung-based hearing may exist in a variety of land-based animals.

"This primitive system of hearing may have been the auditory system for the first animals that lived on land," Hetherington said. "And it appears that it may still be important for some species today, particularly ones that lack middle ears."

Hetherington examined four species of salamanders and three species of lizards to determine if the lungs might play a role in their hearing. Although salamanders lack middle and external ears, both groups of animals have inner ears that can process sound.

In his studies, Hetherington found that sound causes the animal's chest to vibrate, and the vibrations are carried by air from the lungs to the animal's inner ear, where it is processed as sound.

The experiments make clear the importance of the lungs for hearing -- one species of salamander that lacked lungs did not show the chest vibrations that the others did. And when the lungs of the other species were filled with oxygenated saline instead of air, the animals' chests no longer showed vibrations.

The study was published in a recent issue of the Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural and Behavioral Physiology.

Hetherington put the animals on a table in a soundproof chamber. He bounced a beam of laser light off of each animal's skin to measure the skin's movement when exposed to various sound frequencies emitted from a speaker inside the chamber.

Low frequencies caused the greatest vibrations: Peak motion ranged from 1,600 to 2,500 hertz in small newts (newts are a type of salamander); from 1,250 to 1,600 hertz in larger salamanders; and from 1,000 to 2,000 hertz in lizards. Lizards have middle ears, which is where the eardrum is located, and the skin covering this area of the animal's head vibrated at slightly higher frequencies of about 2,000 to 3,000 hertz. The lungless salamanders didn't respond at any frequency.

To determine how dependent the animals were on their lungs for hearing, Hetherington filled the lungs of three red-spotted newts and three green anoles (an anole is a tropical lizard that can change color) with oxygenated saline solution -- the oxygen in the solution allowed the animals to keep breathing. Sure enough, the response to sound -- the vibrations -- dropped.

"It practically disappeared," he said. "While sound may get in through other routes, the lungs are clearly the most sensitive to sound waves."

After filling the lungs with the saline solution, the vibrations noticeably decreased by about 90 percent in all of the animals. The animals' sensitivity to sound was restored when the lungs were emptied and filled again with air.

While Hetherington knew from his previous research that certain frog species depended on their lungs to conduct sound, he wasn't sure before these studies that the same process held true in other amphibians and small reptiles, whose lungs are covered with ribs and muscle.

"Using the lungs to detect sound seems to be especially useful for small animals with really small lungs," Hetherington said. "Thinner body walls respond more readily to sound, so it may be that the lungs can capture a wide range of frequencies only in small animals."

 

 

The Office of University Relations produces articles about faculty research to distribute to the national media. Among the most recent stories:

Patch delivers longer, deeper relief from dental pain

A small adhesive patch promises relief from dental pain up to 45 times longer than a topical anesthetic gel, a new study suggests. Researchers at Ohio State compared the effectiveness of the DentiPatch, a small adhesive patch that contains the numbing agent lidocaine, to a topical anesthetic gel. Patients using the patch reported feeling half as much pain from a needle stick, and some patients reported less discomfort during procedures that required the dentist to scrape underneath the gums, said Michele Carr, a study co-author and an assistant professor of dental hygiene.

www.osu.edu/researchnews/archive/numbgum.htm

 

Labor-inducing folklore still influences pregnant women

In spite of an avalanche of modern medical advances in obstetrics, old wives' tales about pregnancy and labor still run rampant, especially tales on how to get labor going as the due date nears. A new survey found that two out of three pregnant women believed that walking would help induce labor, while nearly half believed that having sex would. But the best that a woman with a normal pregnancy can do is to just wait, said study author Jonathan Schaffir, a clinical assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology. www.osu.edu/researchnews/archive/folkbaby.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Search onCampus Archives of onCampus Advertising in onCampus Contact us Ohio State Homepage onCampus