April
11, 2002
Vol. 31, No.18
|
Tropical ecology
|
|
Photo by Peter Curtis
|
 |
| Ohio State student Patrick McKenna picks coffee at
a small family farm in the foothills of central Costa Rica. McKenna
was among a group of 14 honors undergraduates participating in a biennial
intensive tropical field ecology course led by Peter Curtis, associate
professor of evolution, ecology and organismal biology. During the
trip, from March 20-31, students visited and studied three different
ecosystems: the lowland rain forest near the Atlantic coast, the seasonally
dry forest near the Pacific coast and the cloud forest of the central
mountain area. In addition to visiting the coffee plantation, the
group also stopped at a banana plantation, an active volcano, and
several towns and cities. The researchers observed more than 150 species
of birds, three primate species, numerous reptiles and a large variety
of tropical plants. Resulting student projects include a comparative
study of the size and frequency of treefalls in two tropical forests,
pollination ecology of Costa Rican Begonia species and foraging dynamics
of howler monkeys. Ornithology graduate student Troy Wilson assisted
Curtis in leading the trip. |
USDA: OSU animal care complies with regulations
By Earle Holland, Research Communications
A recent unannounced, two-day inspection of Ohio State's laboratory
animal program by an official from the U.S. Department of Agriculture
has resulted in the institution receiving high marks for complying with
federal animal welfare regulations.
The investigation came as a result of a complaint filed with the USDA
and the National Institutes of Health by a national animal rights group
opposed to a controversial research project under way at Ohio State. The
group alleged that the University's procedures and program were "inadequate"
with regard to this project.
"The report by the USDA inspector investigating this complaint specifically
stated that we are in full compliance in regards to following federal
animal welfare requirements," explained William P. Yonushonis, director
of University Laboratory Animal Resources.
"In essence, this finding vindicates the University. We are, in fact,
following guidelines intended to insure the safety and health of laboratory
animals in our care."
In February, the Physician's Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM)
complained to officials at both the USDA and the National Institute on
Drug Abuse, the federal agency supporting the controversial research.
In its complaints, PCRM alleged that the "procedures for the care and
use of animals are inadequate" and the researcher "failed to adequately
consider alternatives to animal use as is required by federal law."
During the recent two-day review, the USDA inspector reviewed the initial
research plan, or protocol, of the project; the minutes of the Institutional
Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee (ILACUC) meetings at which the
project was discussed; all animal care records related to the project;
and the University's overall animal care program.
The verdict: "No non-compliances identified during this inspection,"
the report read.
"This shows once again that the ILACUC provides a system of properly
monitoring the care and treatment of animals used in research at Ohio
State," Yonushonis said.
The ILACUC is the University's institutional review board, or IRB, and
is made up of more than a dozen University researchers and members of
the community who regularly meet to consider new research protocols and
monitor ongoing use of research animals. They are the primary group charged
with insuring the proper use of animals in research on campus.
USDA officials inspect the University's 15 animal facilities, the ILACUC
and the entire animal care program twice annually. This latest inspection
was focused primarily on one project and the ILACUC's handling of it.
In addition, Ohio State is also inspected and accredited by the Association
for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care on a three-year
interval.
At the center of the PCRM's complaints is a current research project
that uses a unique viral infection in cats to learn how drug abuse can
accelerate the debilitating effects of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
and AIDS. The project, headed by veterinarian Michael Podell, has been
the target of protests by demonstrators for nearly two years.
PCRM had asked the University to halt Podell's work and re-evaluate
the ILACUC's procedures regarding the project. Following the USDA's formal
report, University officials sent a letter to the organization declining
that request.
next page...
|