Feb.
20, 2003
Vol. 32, No. 16
|
A message from the president |
 |
President Karen Holbrook |
University Colleagues:
When I speak before the meetings of the Board of Trustees, I typically
focus my remarks on something that is of immediacy to the University or
particularly relevant to events locally or nationally that impact the
University. When I did that on Feb. 7, I chose to speak on the topic of
diversity. I thought it was important and appropriate to share my views
on the subject with you. Following are those remarks:
The tragic loss of Columbia last weekend (Feb. 1) focused the nation's
attention on seven individuals who served as its crew. These individuals
were a team that worked together in the exploration of space and the advancement
of science with the passionate belief that what we could learn from the
spaceflight would benefit mankind. That team was composed of men and women
of different nationalities, races and disciplines. The diversity of this
team was readily apparent and brought clearly to mind the connection between
excellence and diversity.
I readily appreciate that diversity, like the diversity demonstrated
by the Columbia crew, includes differences in people other than race --
socio-economic, geographic origin, intellectual, gender, religious, sexual
orientation and physical status, for example. However, racial diversity
is in the forefront right now as we celebrate Black History Month across
the nation, the 33rd United Black World Month at Ohio State, and as we
anticipate a future landmark decision from the U. S. Supreme Court on
the two admission cases before them from the University of Michigan. This
will be the first ruling of the Supreme Court in two decades regarding
race-conscious admission decisions. In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in
the Bakke v. California case that race and ethnicity may be considered
among factors aimed at assuring diversity in admissions as a "compelling
interest." The two Michigan cases are of enormous national importance.
They provide an historic opportunity to shape the future of higher education
in our country and their outcome will affect all colleges and universities.
What is at stake is the very quality of our universities and the ability
to prepare students to live and work effectively in our diverse democracy
and in the global economy.
Diversity is a value, and for Ohio State, achieving diversity among
our population of students, faculty and staff is a goal. It is about fairness
and justice to provide access to education for all citizens, and it is
essential to prepare for life in the working world, for good citizenship,
and for political leadership. With the changing demographics, our students
must be effective and comfortable in their interactions with people who
may not think in the same way they do. Employers expect students to work
and interact with an increasingly wider group of people, to see the world
as a community of interdependent people. Knowledge, understanding and
acceptance of other people and cultures are essential.
There is a fundamental link between diversity and the educational mission:
- Diversity is an end to itself, a practice of educational value, not
a way of remedying discrimination or adjusting racial quotas.
- Diversity adds to the learning experience, expands classroom examples,
and improves communication, understanding and sharing of different life
experiences.
- Diversity brings to light the fact that there are differences among
people of different races and among people of the same race -- individuals
cannot be stereotyped.
- Diversity fosters intellectual and social growth and forces students
to change their assumptions and to learn. It simply provides a good
learning environment for everyone.
In our institution, it is everyone's responsibility to foster a climate
of respect, to increase and retain individuals with diverse backgrounds,
lifestyles and cultures, to expand multicultural education, and to communicate
our goals and the educational value of diversity.
Ohio State has a background of strong support for diversity, and our
campus today is more ethnically and racially diverse than at any time
in its history, at the same time that the academic quality and performance
of our student body are at the highest levels ever.
Many students and faculty want to know the position of The Ohio State
University in this situation, and thus I want to reaffirm and to state
unequivocally that this institution is committed to promoting and supporting
diversity of our community. To that end, I would like to be clear about
Ohio State's position with regard to the Michigan cases. The University
filed two amicus briefs when the cases were heard in the 6th Circuit Court.
A few weeks ago, I sent a letter to President Bush in support of the Michigan
case, affirming our belief that the Bakke case remains, and should remain,
the law of the land. Thirty-four national associations of colleges and
universities -- public and private -- have also joined forces to advocate
on behalf of the University of Michigan to urge the president and thus
the Supreme Court to reaffirm the 1978 decision. I sent an op ed to The
Lantern on our position. Professor Deborah Merritt and her colleague,
Bill Lann Lee, former assistant attorney general for civil rights, expressed
their views in an op ed that will be published in the Washington Post,
in response to President Bush's request that universities consider "life
experiences" when admitting students. Merritt posits that race is a life
experience. And, Dr. Mac Stewart published an eloquent piece in the Columbus
Post supporting President Mary Sue Coleman at Michigan and describing
the value of the Bakke decision.
Many of our students and faculty have urged Ohio State to send an amicus
brief in response to President Bush's brief by the Feb. 18 due date on
behalf of Michigan. Michigan's legal staff has requested that institutions,
instead, ask their state attorneys general to sign onto a brief that is
being prepared by the National Association of Attorneys General. We are
in active consultation with Ohio's attorney general at present.
Let me close this section of my report with a quote from William Raspberry,
the author of an editorial published in the Washington Post. He explains
that how we argue for diversity publicly is reflected in whether we see
it as an issue or a goal: "Issues, by their very nature divide. They force
us to choose sides, to work against one another, to produce winners and
losers. That is their political purpose. Goals, on the other hand can
be shared -- even when we embrace different means for reaching them. There
is, of course, no one way of producing the goal of diversity -- no way,
including Michigan's, that is utterly without flaws. But doing nothing
is an option only for those who think the goal isn't very important."
At Ohio State, we see diversity as a goal -- a very important goal.
University welcomes changes in college entrance exams
By Liz Cook, Media Relations
Applicants to Ohio State's freshman
class of 2006 -- presently high school freshmen -- will be the first to
provide a writing sample when taking college entrance exams.
In the 2004-05 academic year, the ACT assessment will include an optional
writing section, an option which students planning to apply for admission
to Ohio State will be required to take. The College Board will include
a required writing section on its SAT assessment beginning in 2005.
Mabel Freeman, assistant vice president for Undergraduate Admissions
and First Year Experience, said announcing the decision now will give
students appropriate time to prepare.
"It is our intent to ensure that students who are beginning to examine
their college choices are informed of the admission standards required
by Ohio State," Freeman said. "It is important to us that both students
and schools are given sufficient time to prepare for this change."
Roughly 84 percent of students admitted to Ohio State provide ACT scores.
Freeman added that because the SAT change will be required, requiring
the writing section from students who take the ACT is practical and fair.
Freeman said the Faculty Committee on Admissions unanimously approved
the writing requirement in late January.
"The development of effective writing skills is critical to an individual's
success in high school, college, and beyond," Freeman said. "Our requirement
of a writing assessment is a reflection of our commitment to the importance
of written communication in our society."
Both the ACT and SAT organizations, responding to concerns about the
need to put a greater emphasis on writing skills, announced changes to
their exams last summer. Ohio State joins the universities of Texas and
Michigan, each of which plan to require the writing assessment from applicants
taking the ACT exam.
Both ACT and Ohio State administrators plan to conduct validity studies
once the writing assessment is introduced to determine the correlation
between performance on the exam and performance in college-level composition
courses. Such studies will allow ACT to adjust the writing section as
appropriate for future testers and will allow the University to determine
how best to use writing assessment scores in its admissions process.
According to the ACT, which also tests students in English, math, reading
and science, Ohio is one of the top five states in the number of ACT-tested
high school graduates. Illinois, Michigan, Texas and Florida are among
the others. Nationally, more than 2 million ACT assessments were administered
in 2001-02.
The College Board reported that in 2000-01, 2 million high school students
took the SAT I exam, which assesses verbal and math skills.
Poet Giovanni reaches students through lecture |
 |
By Jo McCulty
Poet Nikki Giovanni, right, speaks with a student after her
lecture at the Hale Center Feb. 6. Freshman Renee Portis, center
in hat, and sophomore Tia Twyman, second from right, listen in.
Giovanni wears a Kente cloth, which originated in Ghana, Africa,
as a gift usually bestowed on royalty, and which the Hale Center
presents to its honored guests. Giovanni visited Ohio State as part
of a collaborative effort between the Office of First Year Experience
and the Thurber House. One of the most widely read American poets,
Giovanni has written more than two dozen books, including volumes
of poetry, illustrated children's books and three collections of
essays.
|
next page...
|