|
||||
|
Oct.
23, 2003
|
New diode could enable faster, more efficient electronicsBy PAM FROST GORDER, Research Communications Engineers have designed a new diode that transmits more electricity than any other device of its kind, and the inspiration for it came from technology that is 40 years old. Unlike other diodes in its class, called tunnel diodes, the new diode is compatible with silicon, so manufacturers could easily build it into mainstream electronic devices such as cell phones and computers. Industry has long sought to marry tunnel diodes with conventional electronics as a means to simplify increasingly complex circuits, explained Paul Berger, professor of electrical engineering and physics at Ohio State. "Computer chips now are worse than the Los Angeles freeway, with wires running back and forth clogging the path of propagating signals," Berger said. "At some point, things are going to come to a grinding halt, and chips won't run any faster." Because this diode can replace some of the circuits on a typical chip, it could potentially simplify chip design without compromising performance. "Essentially, manufacturers would get more bang for their buck," Berger said. Researchers around the world have toiled for decades to develop such a diode, which could enable fast, efficient electronics that run on low-power batteries by requiring fewer devices to perform the same function. The new diode conducts 150,000 amps per square centimeter of its silicon-based material -- a rate three times higher than that of the only comparable silicon tunnel diode. Berger designed the diode with a team of engineers from Ohio State, the Naval Research Laboratory and the University of California, Riverside. They describe it in an upcoming issue of the journal Applied Physics Letters. "Our goal was to develop a tunnel diode that could be built directly onto a traditional computer chip at minimal cost," Berger said. "And we've achieved that." Tunnel diodes are so named because they exploit a quantum mechanical effect known as tunneling, which lets electrons pass through barriers unhindered. The first tunnel diodes were created in the 1960s, and led to a Nobel Prize for physicist Leo Esaki in 1973. Since then, in an effort to build more powerful diodes, researchers have increasingly turned to expensive, exotic materials that aren't compatible with silicon, but allow tailored properties not often available in silicon. Most modern tunnel diodes are "intraband" diodes, meaning they restrict the movements of electrons to one energy level, or "band," within the semiconductor crystal. But the Esaki tunnel diodes were "interband" diodes -- they permitted electrons to pass back and forth between different energy bands. At first, Berger's team tried to develop intraband diodes with silicon technology. But faced with what he called a "materials science nightmare," they turned instead to Esaki's early tunnel diode technology for inspiration. To construct a powerful interband diode, Berger's team had to develop a new technique for creating silicon structures that contain unusually large quantities of other chemical elements, or dopants, such as boron and phosphorus. "Essentially, we traded one nightmare for another," Berger said with a laugh. "Mother Nature doesn't want that much dopant in one place, but the doping problem was one that we felt we could tackle." They layered silicon and silicon-germanium into a structure that measured only a few nanometers, or billionths of a meter, high. Then they discovered that by changing the thickness of a central "spacer" layer, where the electrons are tunneling, they could tailor the amount of current that passed through the material. This had to be tempered with a design that kept the boron and phosphorus from intermixing. Berger said that the diode's ability to operate in low-power conditions makes it ideal for use in power-hungry devices that generate radio-frequency signals, such as cordless home telephones and cell phones. With little power input, the diode could generate a strong signal. One other application that Berger finds particularly interesting involves medical devices. The diode could support a low-power data link that would let doctors perform diagnostics on pacemakers and other implants by remote, without wires protruding through a patient's skin that could cause infections. Co-authors on the paper included electrical engineering graduate students Niu Jin, Sung-Yong Chung and Anthony Rice, and physics graduate student Ronghua Yu, all of Ohio State; Phillip E. Thompson of the Naval Research Lab; and Roger Lake of the University of California, Riverside. This work was sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research. Berger will continue work supported by NSF and a major electronics company to develop wireless applications for the technology. Depending on that initial development, the technology could reach consumers anywhere from five to 15 years from now.
The Office of University Relations produces articles about faculty research to distribute to the national media. Among the most recent stories: Don't rely on BMI to indicate weight problem in childrenUsing body mass index (BMI) and skin-fold measurements -- two methods typically used to determine if a child has too much body fat -- may not provide accurate results, a new study reports. According to the research, a better way to determine a child's body fat percentage is with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), a method that sends a harmless electrical current through the body to measure body fat percentage. Using BMI measurements, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2000 estimated that 15 percent of U.S. children aged 6 to 11 were overweight. "But there are a number of children who are at risk for becoming overweight that may not be included in the CDC estimate," said Theresa Skybo, the study's lead author and an assistant professor of nursing. In the study of 58 third-grade children, the researchers used all three methods -- BMI, skin-fold measurements and BIA -- to determine body fat. When the researchers compared the results of the three methods, they found that one out of three children risked developing a weight problem. But BIA measurements alone gave the most telling results: nine out of 10 girls in the study were either overweight or at risk for becoming overweight, as were nearly half of the boys. www.osu.edu/researchnews/archive/bigkids.htm
|
|||